×

Warning

JUser: :_load: Unable to load user with ID: 62
  • Welcome to the LOSRA Website

    Welcome to the LOSRA Website

    The Lower Sunbury Residents' Association Read More
  • Become a Member

    Become a Member

    We invite anybody interested in the issues facing Lower Sunbury to subscribe Read More
  • View Our Newletters

    View Our Newletters

    You can find all the recent LOSRA Newsletter available to download Read More
  • LOSRA's Aims

    LOSRA's Aims

    To optimise and enhance the quality of life for Lower Sunbury residents by all appropriate means Read More
  • Sunbury As It Was

    Sunbury As It Was

    Visit the LOSRA Gallery for images past and Present Read More
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Monday, 16 July 2012 10:44

Reply from Secretary of State to LOSRA's 'Call-in' Request

Rate this item
(3 votes)

Further to the article published on 10th July below, the following reply has been received from the Case Officer at the Planning Inspectorate. Despite LOSRA providing evidence that the application would indeed "have significant effects beyond its immediate locality", the Secretary of State, doesn't agree; and signally fails to give a reason for his disagreement. Readers will have to make up their own minds as to the degree of enquiry devoted to LOSRA's request given that the reply appears to derive from a standard template and was turned around within 3 days.

The full text of the email is reproduced here:

Further your email of the 9th July 2012, regarding the above planning application.

Firstly, I would like to explain that local planning authorities have the statutory responsibility for considering proposals for development. Authorities have to determine planning applications in the light of the local development plan for the area and any other material planning considerations. They must also take into account any representations received and give reasons for their decision. The Government is clear that localism and decentralisation are at the heart of their planning agenda and the general approach of the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government is not to interfere with the jurisdiction of authorities on planning matters

As requested, the Secretary of State has carefully considered this case against call-in policy, as set out in the 1999 Caborn Statement. The policy makes it clear that the power to call in a case will only be used very selectively. The Government is committed to give more power to councils and communities to make their own decisions on planning issues, and believes planning decisions should be made at the local level wherever possible.

The Secretary of State has carefully considered the impact of the proposal, and the key policy issues which this case raises. In his opinion, the proposals do not: involve a conflict with national policies on important matters; have significant effects beyond their immediate locality; give rise to substantial regional or national controversy; raise significant architectural and urban design issues; or involve the interests of national security or of Foreign Governments. Nor does he consider that there is any other sufficient reason to call the application in for his own determination. He has therefore decided the application should be determined at local level, and has not called it in.

In considering whether to exercise his discretion to call in this application, the Secretary of State has not considered the matter of whether the application is EIA development for the purposes of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011. The local planning authority responsible for determining this application remains the relevant authority responsible for considering whether these regulations apply to this proposed development and, if so, for ensuring that the requirements of the Regulations are complied with.

I appreciate that you will be disappointed with the decision. It is, however, now for Elmbridge Borough Council to determine this application.

Kind regards

Mrs M Peart

Casework Officer

3 comments

  • Comment Link John Hirsh Tuesday, 24 July 2012 22:53 posted by John Hirsh

    If Remy Smith had taken the trouble to read the LOSRA representation he would have seen that the Association DID NOT OPPOSE the Walton Riverside sports development; merely suggested a different configuration to mitigate the worst effects of noise and light pollution.

  • Comment Link Remy Smith Tuesday, 17 July 2012 12:03 posted by Remy Smith

    Totally support this application as it'll provide a much needed 'sports hub' for the local area. Glad that LOSRA has had such an unsuccessful campaign in halting the London Irish & Walton riverside sports developments.

  • Comment Link Usain Bolt Monday, 16 July 2012 20:12 posted by Usain Bolt

    They were probably still laughing at you calling it a football "stadium"

    Who will play there? Walton don't even have a football team remotely popular enough.
    Likewise I doubt many large athletics meetings are going to be held in Walton, there's a load of new facilities just been built in central London

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.

Subscribe for 2024

Sunbury Ferry

Hedgehog Project

Join Our Mailing List

Latest Local News

17 June 2024